6/11/2023 0 Comments When does chernobylite come out![]() ![]() “We decided to save the history of Chernobyl. Lozbin and her husband returned to their home seven kilometers away from Chernobyl in 2010. He crossed through the barbed wire,” Oleksandra Lozbin, one of the estimated 160 people to return to the zone, tells Reuters. He came back when it was all closed here, when it was prohibited to come here. “My husband had wanted to come back to his homeland all his life. "Because some of the isotopes released during a nuclear accident remain radioactive for tens of thousands of years, cleanup is the work not just of the first responders but also of their descendants and their descendants' descendants," writes Time's Eben Harrell and James Marson. "Asked when the reactor site would again become inhabitable, Ihor Gramotkin, director of the Chernobyl power plant, replies 'At least 20,000 years.'"ĭespite the 3,000 – or 20,000 – year warning, some locals have decided to repopulate the area their relatives called home. Approximately 150,000 square kilometers of land between Belarus, Ukraine and Russia (an area larger than the state of New York) was contaminated so severely that 8 million people suffered serious land use restrictions or relocation and 5 million people still live in zones considered radioactive in 2016. An estimated 220,000 people were displaced from their homes, and the radioactive fallout from the accident made 4,440 square kilometers of agricultural land and 6,820 square kilometers of forests in Belarus and Ukraine unusable.”Ī power surge during a reactor test led to an explosion of Unit 4 on Apand subsequent fires throughout the plant. “The 1986 Chernobyl disaster in Ukraine is one of the most frightening examples of the potentially catastrophic consequences of a nuclear accident. “Despite proponents’ claims that it is safe, the history of nuclear energy is marked by a number of disasters and near disasters,” explains the organization Physicians for Social Responsibility. The immediate area around Chernobyl will have to remain empty for at least 3,000 years because of dangerously high contamination levels, proof, say some opponents, of nuclear energy’s long-term dangers. “Never in human history has such a large quantity of long-lived radioisotopes been released into the environment by a single event.”Īlthough three decades have passed since the accident, the town of Pripyat is no closer to being repopulated. “The Chernobyl disaster caused irreversible damage to the environment that will last for thousands of years,” says Greenpeace in their 2016 study of the accident. Tuesday will mark 30 years since the world’s worst nuclear accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Station in Pripyat, Ukraine. That is an awesome responsibility and a revolutionary opportunity. Even when the world is unkind, we can be unmoved in our determination to love, to build, to seek credible hope. Never to excuse or ignore cruelty or crime, but to recognize that how we view the world shapes the world. What is the media’s responsibility?Author and anti-apartheid activist Alan Paton once said of the Monitor, “It gives no shrift to any belief in the irredeemable wickedness of man, nor in the futility of human endeavor.”In addition to reporting acts of kindness, perhaps a next step is to see the world through a lens of kindness. But can this elevation only happen with stories of kindness? Must the rest of the news abandon us to despair?The world is asking us to consider that question deeply. She defined kindness and heroism as “moral beauty,” which “triggers ‘elevation’ – a positive and uplifting feeling” that “acts as an emotional reset button, replacing feelings of cynicism with hope, love and optimism.”The study suggested this happens when one watches a news story about kindness after watching ones about bombings, cruelty, and violence. They support “the belief that the world and people in it are good.” And they provide “relief to the pain we experience when we see others suffering.”It was her fourth point that stuck with me. A week ago, a British researcher published an article titled “Stories of kindness may counteract the negative effects of looking at bad news.” As you might imagine, I was intrigued.Kathryn Buchanan of the University of Essex shared four main takeaways from her research: Stories of kindness remind us of our shared values. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |